94 Ohio App. 3d 34 - State v. Peeples’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably 153 Ohio App. 3d 44 - State v. Coe (2003), Ex Parte Moody (1996)
52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Leon · State v. Bradley · United States v. Cronic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the `counsel' guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“raise[s] compelling questions concerning the integrity of the adversarial process”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.