Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

94 Ohio St. 3d 1227

State v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2001

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2001-03-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2001

1 state decisions

Relies on Butland v. Butland

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-03-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Moyer, C.J.

¶1This affidavit of disqualification filed by Jean M. Gallagher, counsel for defendant, seeks the disqualification of Judge Timothy J. McGinty from further proceedings in the above-captioned case, State v. Raysheem Smith. This affidavit of disqualification was filed on March 29, 2001, which is one day prior to the pretrial hearing scheduled by Judge McGinty.

¶2R.C. 2701.03(B)(4) requires that an affidavit of disqualification be filed no later than seven days prior to the next scheduled hearing in the underlying case. This statutory requirement will be set aside only in circumstances where affiant can establish that compliance with the provision is impossible. See In re Disqualification of Leskovyansky (1999), 88 Ohio St.3d 1210, 723 N.E.2d 1099.

¶3Here, affiant claims that the affidavit was filed one day prior to the hearing through no fault of her own. However, affiant admits in the very next sentence of her affidavit that she neglected to immediately notify and consult with another assistant public defender regarding the filing of the affidavit. See paragraph 28 of the March 29, 2001 affidavit. Under these circumstances, and based on the affidavit and supporting materials filed by affiant, I cannot conclude that it was impossible for affiant to comply with the statutory filing requirement.

¶4For these reasons, the affidavit of disqualification is dismissed as not timely filed. The case shall proceed before Judge McGinty.

/94/ohiost3d/1227 · .json · Public domain