Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 OHIOST3D 173 - State v. Were

State v. Were’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

133
cited by 133 later decisions
2
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

133 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 133 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion) (2016), State v. Skatzes (2004)

133 state decisions

610200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · Drope v. Missouri · State v. Berry · State v. Hessler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 133 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the issue is raised after the trial has commenced, the court shall hold a hearing on the issue only for good cause shown or on the court's own motion.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “there are sufficient indicia of incompetency to call into doubt the defendant's competency to stand trial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A defendant is presumed to be competent to stand trial. If, after a hearing, the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that, because of the defendant's present mental condition, the defendant is incapable of understanding the nature and objective of the proceedings against the defendant or of assisting in the defendant's defense, the court shall find the defendant incompetent to stand trial and shall enter an order authorized by section 2945.38 of the Revised Code.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.