Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 OHIOST3D 246 - State v. Herring

State v. Herring’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

437
cited by 437 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 427 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 437 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2025 · most notably Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez (2007), State v. Conway (2006)

4 federal appellate · 427 state decisions

2260200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Batson v. Kentucky · Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 437 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] charge of complicity may be stated in terms of this section, or in terms of the principal offense.”
    34 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To support a conviction for complicity by aiding and abetting pursuant to R.C. 2923.03 (A)(2), the evidence must show that the defendant supported, assisted, encouraged, cooperated with, advised, or incited the principal in the commission of the crime, and that the defendant shared the criminal intent of the principal. Such intent may be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the crime.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A trial court's ruling on a demonstrative exhibit is reviewed under the abuse-of-discretion standard. * * *' The term”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.