Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 Okla. 294 - Balthrop v. Clark

Balthrop v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1929
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jefferson v. Winkler · Tidal Oil Company v. Flanagan · F. B. Collins Inv. Co. of Clinton v. Beard · Bruner Et Ux. v. Cobb · Brewer v. Perryman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Defendants’ possession, right, and equities as they designate them, in order to be such in fact, must depend on some prior, lawful, actual, contractual relations, or at least grow out of some act or relation not unlawful: otherwise, by circumvention, an object could be accomplished by indirection which could not be accomplished by direction. One could be guilty of the most flagrant violation of the inhibition imposed in reference to leasing full-blood Indian lands, and by artifice accomplish just what Congress intended to forbid.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.