Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

94 Okla. Crim. 236

Wright v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 1951-07-03

(Syllabus.) <bold>Appeal and Error — Sufficiency of Evidence to Sustain Judgment.</bold> The jury must determine the facts and its judgment based upon competent evidence will be upheld on appeal.

Decided 1951-07-03

JONES, J.

¶1The defendant, Willis Carl Wright, was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county of the offense of driving an automobile on the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating' liquor and pursuant to the verdict of the jury was sentenced to pay a fine of $10; and has appealed.

¶2No brief has been filed on behalf of the defendant.

¶3We have examined the record and while the testimony conflicted in some particulars, the evidence of the state was fairly conclusive of the defendant’s guilt. No fundamental error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

BRETT, P. J., and POWELL, J., concur.
/94/oklacrim/236 · .json · Public domain