94 Okla. Crim. 381 - Secondi v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 94 Okla. Crim. 110 - Hathcox v. State · 62 Okla. Crim. 167 - Adams v. State · 61 Okla. Crim. 318 - Cooper v. State · 71 Okla. Crim. 175 - Peters v. State · 71 Okla. Crim. 1 - Rainey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where there is no proper record in the case-made of alleged improper remarks of the prosecuting attorney to the jury, this court will not consider the same.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Love v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.