94 Or. App. 240 - State v. McIntyre’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 1997
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the burglary, was the basis for a subsequent criminal charge. In McIntyre , when the defendant appealed his conviction for that burglary on the ground that it had been previously litigated, the state argued that the contempt court did not necessarily base its holding on the burglary. We were not persuaded by that argument. Instead, we held that the burglary”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“did violate the order and particularly the incident that seems most clear is his contact [June 9, 1986].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.