Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

94 Or. App. 3

State v. Howley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 16, 1988

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1988-11-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1988

1 state decisions

Applies OR 131 § 131.515

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-11-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM

¶1Defendant’s conviction for harassment was reversed by this court for lack of evidence to support the jury’s verdict, and the cause remanded for a new trial. State v. Howley, 92 Or App 575, 758 P2d 893 (1988). On motion for reconsideration, defendant argues that a retrial in this case is prohibited by the former jeopardy provisions of ORS 131.515; Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution; and the Fifth Amendment. The granting of a new trial after a judgment of acquittal for lack of evidence violates the principles of former jeopardy, whether the judgment of acquittal is rendered pursuant to a jury verdict or by the order of an appellate court. Or Const, Art I, § 12.

¶2Motion for reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified; remanded with instructions to dismiss complaint.

/94/orapp/3 · .json · Public domain