State v. McIntosh’s Empirical Analysis
1913
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 1995
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Albert Adams v. People of the State of New York · State v. McDaniel · State v. Atkinson · State v. . Garrett · State v. Senn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Statements made in the presence of a party are generally admissible, if he remains silent, when they are made, and the circumstances are such that he can speak and naturally would or ought to respond to them. In such circumstances, his silence may afford ground for inferring that he acquiesces in the truth of the statements. But, where the situation is such that it would be improper for him to respond, statements made to him or in his presence are inadmissible. So, also, if he positively and unequivocally denies the truth of such statements,... they are inadmissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Nolan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.