Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 SO3D 1092 - Hardison v. State

Hardison v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · Hernandez v. New York · Powers v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘First, the party objecting to the peremptory strike of a potential juror must make a prima facie showing that race was the criterion for the strike. Second, upon such a showing,1 the burden shifts to the [proponent of, the strike] to articulate a race-neutral reason for excluding that particular - juror. Finally, after a race-neutral explanation has been offered by [the proponent of the strike], the trial court must determine- whether the objecting party has met its burden to prove that there has been purposeful discrimination in the exercise, of the peremptory strike, i.e., that the reason given was a pretext for discrimination. . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the opponent is a member of a cognizable class, such as a racial group; (2) the proponent has used peremptory strikes to remove venire members in that class; and (3) the facts and circumstances give rise to an inference that the proponent used peremptory strikes to purposefully remove individuals of that class.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “must allow the strike unless the other party demonstrates that the valid race-neutral reason was a pretext for discrimination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.