Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 SO3D 229 - Havard v. State

Havard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) the reason for the arrest and circumstances surrounding the arrest; (b) any possible -violations of the client’s right to counsel; (c) the entire trial transcript; (d) all rulings of the trial court; (e) possible prosecutorial misconduct; (f) all jury instructions; (g) all exhibits, whether admitted into evidence or not; and (h) possible misapplication of the law in sentencing.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.