Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

94 So. 3d 481

94 So.3d 481

37 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 258

Frost v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 5, 2012

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 2012-04-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2012

1 state decisions

Relies on Sterling Chemicals, Inc. v. Evans · Harris v. State · 53 So. 3d 1119 - Frost v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-04-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We have for review Frost v. State, 53 So.3d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), a case that was stayed pending disposition of Harris v. State, 71 So.3d 756 (Fla.2011), cert, granted, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1796, 182 L.Ed.2d 615 (U.S. Mar. 26, 2012). We thereafter issued an order directing respondent to show cause why this Court should not accept jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the decision being reviewed, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Harris. Upon review of the response, we have determined to accept jurisdiction. Accordingly, we grant the petition for review in the present case. The decision under review is quashed and this matter is remanded to the Fourth District Court of Appeal for application of our decision in Harris.

¶2It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, J., dissent.
/94/so3d/481 · .json · Public domain