94 So. 3d 822 - State ex rel. S.L.’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Kissinger v. Halperin · 603 So. 2d 731 - State v. Hearold
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f the entirety of the evidence, both admissible and inadmissible, was insufficient to support the conviction, the defendant is entitled to an acquittal and no further inquiry as to trial errors is necessary. State v. Hearold, 603 So.2d 731, 734 (La.1992); State v. Jones, 05-840 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/28/06) , 927 So.2d 514, 519 . On the other hand, when the entirety of the evidence, even evidence erroneously admitted, is sufficient to support the conviction, the defendant is not entitled to an acquittal, and the reviewing court must consider the assignments of trial error to determine whether the accused is entitled to a new trial. Hea-rold, supra.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In addition to proving the statutory elements of the charged offense, the State is required to prove the identity of the perpetrator. State v. Searls, 04-790 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1/25/05) , 895 So.2d 40, 43 . The State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to carry its burden of proof when the key issue is identification. Id. Positive identification by one witness is sufficient to support a conviction. State v. Benoit, 07-35 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/29/07) , 960 So.2d 279, 282 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“any words or actions on the part of the police (other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody) that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.