Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 SW3D 11 - Thompson v. State

Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 278th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Holloway v. Arkansas · Mickens v. Taylor · Nix v. Whiteside

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The most likely scenario for a conflict of interest to develop is when an attorney represents two co-defendants in the same case, ie., multiple or joint representation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.