Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 SW3D 124 - Adi v. State

Adi v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Tibbs v. Florida · Cole v. State of Arkansas · Clewis v. State · Dunn v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “proof of guilt is so obviously weak as to undermine confidence in the [fact-finder's] determination, or the proof of guilt, although adequate if taken alone, is greatly outweighed by the contrary proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We conduct a factual sufficiency review by referencing a hypothetically correct jury charge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.