Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 S.W.3d 46 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 3rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Malik v. State · Boykin v. State · Simmons v. Arnim · Barnes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Controlled substance” means a substance, including a drug, an adulterant, and a dilutant, listed in Schedules I through V or Penalty Groups 1, 1-A, or 2 through 4. The term includes the aggregate weight of any mixture, solution, or other substance containing a controlled substance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.