Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 Tex. 209 - Gill v. Everman

Gill v. Everman’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2006

16 state decisions

7019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We conclude that the general rule, which is well established in this court, applies in this case, and that, in the absence of evidence as to the laws of Kentucky, we must presume that the laws of that state, in relation to the appointment and qualification of guardians, are the same as the laws of Texas.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.