Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 U.S. 219 - United States v. Phisterer

United States v. Phisterer’s Empirical Analysis

94 U.S. 219 · 1876

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2020

3 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

401876188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Williamson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Quarters are expected to be furnished by the government to its officers; when it cannot thus furnish, it allows them to be obtained otherwise, and pays a money compensation therefore, called commutation. This is upon the assumption, first, that the officers are actually engaged in the public service; and, second, that such quarters are necessary to the discharge of their duty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a place where troops are assembled, where military stores, animate or inanimate, are kept or distributed, where military duty is performed or military protection afforded,-where something, in short, more or less closely connected with arms or war is kept or is to be done.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.