Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 U.S. 225 - Cammeyer v. Newton

Cammeyer v. Newton’s Empirical Analysis

94 U.S. 225 · 1876

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2006 · most notably Continental Paper Bag Company v. Eastern Paper Bag Company (1908), Belknap v. Schild (1896)

5 federal appellate · 4 district · 9 state decisions

12018761880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Seymour v. Osborne · Mitchell v. Harmony · United States v. Russell · United States v. Burns

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Agents of the public have no more right to take such private property than other individuals under that provision, as it contains no exception warranting any such invasion of the private rights of individuals. Conclusive support to that proposition is found in a recent decision of this court, in which it is held that the government cannot, after the patent is issued, make use of the improvement any more than a prívate individual, without license of the inventor or making him compensation. U. S. v. Burns, 12 Wall. 246 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Public employment is no defense to the employe for having converted the private property of another to the public use, without his consent and without just compensation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the exclusive right to make, use and vend the invention or discovery throughotít the United States.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.