Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 U.S. 500 - Eyster v. Centennial Board of Finance

Eyster v. Centennial Board of Finance’s Empirical Analysis

94 U.S. 500 · 1876

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2012 · most notably United States v. Midwest Oil Co. (1915), Crabb v. Zerbst (1938)

12 federal appellate · 28 state decisions — followed in 12 states

90187618801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The capital stock of this corporation was not employed in, but to prepare for, the business of the contemplated exhibition; and the receipts of the exhibition, over and above its current expenses, are the profits of the business. These were the only profits anticipated. They are, in fact, the net receipts, which, according to the common understanding, ordinarily represent the profits of a business. . . . Popularly speaking, the net receipts of a business are its profits. So here, as the business to be carried on was that of an. exhibition, and its profits were to be derived only from its receipts, to the popular mind the net receipts would represent the net profits.” (Page 503.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The liability of a corporation to its stockholders on account of their stock is not a debt. The shares of a stockholder represent his proportion of the property of a corporation; and, upon the winding up of its affairs, the assets remaining after all liabilities are discharged are for division among the stockholders, according to their respective interests. The payment to stockholders upon such a division is for a dividend of the property divided, not for a debt owing by the corporation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.