94 Wash. 2d 176 - State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 120 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Greenwood (1993), 99 Wash. 2d 501 - State v. Caliguri (1983)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 40 Wash. 2d 18 - State v. Goebel · 85 Wash. 2d 730 - State v. Fagalde · People v. Poplis · 89 Wash. 2d 321 - Burlington Northern, Inc. v. Johnston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to human life”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Thus, we cannot accept the appellant's theory that confidential communications between the perpetrator and a psychologist, or a doctor, or a mental health center employee, are protected from disclosure and privileged in a judicial proceeding, according to the terms of the applicable statutes. Such protection might well be deemed to be in the public interest. But .it is evident that, in its recent enactments, the legislature has attached greater importance to the reporting of incidents of child abuse and the prosecution of perpetrators than to counseling and treatment of persons whose mental or emotional problems cause them to inflict such abuse.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“between the filing of an information and the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.