Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green

94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

937
cited by 937 later decisions
12
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

933 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 937 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas (1992), 154 Wash. 2d 118 - State v. Hughes (2005)

933 state decisions — followed in 12 states

388019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Rhode Island v. Innis · Oregon v. Mathiason

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 937 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    95 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he standard of review is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the State, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he mere incidental restraint and movement of a victim which might occur during the course of a [crime] are not, standing alone, indicia of a true kidnapping.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.