Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 Wash. 2d 711 - State v. Chrisman

94 Wash. 2d 711 - State v. Chrisman’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2019 · most notably Washington v. Chrisman (1982), 95 Wash. 2d 898 - State v. Seagull (1981)

29 state decisions

1801980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Chimel v. California · Payton v. New York · Coolidge v. New Hampshire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`(1) a prior justification for intrusion; (2) inadvertent discovery of incriminating evidence; and (3) immediate knowledge by the officer that he had evidence before him'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “by means sufficiently distinguishable to be purged of the primary taint”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “There is absolutely no evidence that it was necessary for [the officer] to enter the room to seize a weapon which might be used in an assault, that the bottle of gin was about to be destroyed, or that Overdahl was going to attempt an escape. It was a small room. [The officer] was standing in the one exit, and it was on the 11th story. It was not necessary for the officer to enter the room to make certain Overdahl secured his identification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.