Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 Wash. 2d 851 - Kellogg v. State

94 Wash. 2d 851 - Kellogg v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2015

10 state decisions

501980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · 94 Wash. 2d 640 - Barrie v. Hosts of America, Inc. · 75 Wash. 2d 768 - January v. Porter · 94 Wash. 2d 754 - State v. Fortun · 50 Wash. 2d 649 - Sennett v. Zimmerman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A police officer is privileged to arrest without a warrant for offenses committed outside his presence if he has reasonable grounds to believe (1) that the offense committed is a felony, and (2) that the person apprehended committed the felony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`It is the general, if not the universal, rule that, when a person is arrested and placed in jail, and is detained there for more than a reasonable time, the detaining [agency] is liable in an action for damages.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Unlawful imprisonment is the intentional confinement of another's person, unjustified under the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.