State v. Roman’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 120 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Greenwood · 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 107 Wash. 2d 59 - State v. Pacheco · 121 Wash. 2d 852 - State v. Anderson · 94 Wash. 2d 690 - State v. Carpenter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“between the filing of charges and the defendant's first appearance in court, first appearance will be backdated to the fourteenth day after filing, and trial must commence within 60/90 days after that. [9] A delay may be”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Roman“had the warrant. [2] In the same teletype, Stanislaus County stated that Roman would complete his Stanislaus County sentence on November 27, 1995, and that it would”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Roman“if it lasts 45 days or more. [10] A delay is”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Roman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.