94 Wash. App. 282 - State v. Eacret’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2021
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Simmons v. United States · United States v. Cunningham · 89 Wash. 2d 430 - State v. Hilliard · 101 Wash. 2d 604 - State v. Vaughn · 29 Wash. App. 461 - State v. Weddel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An out-of-court photographic identification meets due process requirements if it is not so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kinard“are not suggestive enough to warrant further inquiry into the likelihood of misidentification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`one that directs undue attention to a particular photo.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kinard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.