94 Wash. App. 327 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2018
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002)
Relies on United States v. Feola · 106 Wash. 2d 176 - State v. Hughes · 101 Wash. 2d 612 - State v. Acosta · State v. Smith · 118 Wash. 2d 151 - State v. Hopper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Assault in the third degree. (1) A person is guilty of assault in the third degree if he or she, under circumstances not amounting to assault in the first or second degree: (g) Assaults a law enforcement officer or other employee of a law enforcement agency who was performing his or her official duties at the time of the assault;[ 56 ] (2) Assault in the third degree is a class C felony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown“in order to convict under RCW 9A.36.031(1)(g), the State is not required to prove that the defendant knew either that the victim was a law enforcement officer or that the victim was performing official duties at the time of the assault.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown“[a]ssaults [of] a law enforcement officer or other employee of a law enforcement agency who was performing his or her official duties at the time of the assault.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.