Kemp v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis
940 F.2d 110 · 1991
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2013
10 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1701 (Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 1714 · 15 U.S.C. § 1719 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 77A (§ 1 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Relies on United States v. New York Telephone Co. · Johnson v. Mississippi · Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. Indiana · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Such a remedy ... must be supported by a showing of fraud, mismanagement, or other reason to believe that, absent the freeze order, the assets would be depleted or otherwise become unavailable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“officers, directors and participating planners may be held individually liable” under the Land Sales Act because”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.