Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 940 F.2d 455 - United States v. Mares

United States v. Mares’s Empirical Analysis

940 F.2d 455 · 1991

Citation profile

248
cited by 248 later decisions
3
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

147 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 248 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably United States v. Bishop (1992), United States v. Sarno (1995)

147 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

1920199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Griffin v. California · Pinkerton v. United States · Patterson v. United States · Nicholas v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 248 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The relevant inquiry is not whether the evidence excludes every hypothesis except guilt, but whether the jury could reasonably arrive at its verdict.”
    24 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Evidence of even a slight connection, if proven beyond a reasonable doubt, is sufficient to convict a defendant of knowingly participating in an established conspiracy.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.