Maisano III’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2012
5 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6331
Relies on Katz v. United States · Smith v. Maryland · United States v. Santana · Truong Dinh Hung v. United States · In re Disbarment of Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“What a person knowingly exposes to the public . . . is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“), of which the Maisanos are trustees. Thus, according to the Maisanos, the IRS seized property belonging to the wrong party. When the agents arrived, Audrey Maisano asked to see a court order. The agents produced a levy and notice of seizure. Because the documents were not court orders, Ms. Maisano informed the agents that they were trespassing and asked them to leave. Despite her protests, the defendants towed the vehicle from the Maisanos' driveway. 1 4 On September 16, 1988, the Maisanos filed a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Maisano v. Welcher“If the [truck] belongs to the trust, the [plaintiffs] have no standing to sue and their case must be dismissed. If the [truck] actually belongs to the [plaintiffs], they lose their argument that the IRS seized property belonging to the wrong party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.