Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 940 P2D 1092 - People v. James

People v. James’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2016

3 state decisions

10199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alford v. United States · Williams v. United States · People v. Wilhite · Wilson v. People · People v. Lippoldt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If an offender is rejected after acceptance by a community corrections board or a community corrections program, the court may resentence the offender without any further hearing so long as the offender’s sentence does not exceed the sentence which was originally imposed upon the offender, (emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.