Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 940 P2D 991 - Walter v. Hall

Walter v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

2 district · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wimberly v. Ettenberg · The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Vincent Joseph SPOTO · People v. Ibarra · 141 N.J. Super. 365 - Neveroski v. Blair · People v. Quintana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “6-1-113. Damages. (1) The provisions of this article shall be available to any person in a civil action for any claim against any person who has engaged in or caused another to engage in any deceptive trade practice listed in section 6-1-105 or 6-1-105.5. (2) ... [A]ny person who, in a private civil action, is found to have engaged in or caused another to engage in any deceptive trade practice listed in section 6-1-105 or 6-1-105.5 shall be liable in an amount equal to the sum of: (a) Three times the amount of actual damages sustained or two hundred fifty dollars, whichever is greater; and (b) In the case of any successful action to enforce said liability, the costs of the action together with reasonable attorney fees as determined by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “undisputed that the actions and representations of defendants caused fences to be torn down, locks to be cut, and gates to be left open.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.