940 So. 2d 331 - Irvin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
38 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Young · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Oregon v. Mathiason
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.””
14 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Garzarek v. State · Walden v. State“If the defendant's commission of another crime or misdeed is an element of guilt, or tends to prove his guilt otherwise than by showing of bad character, then proof of such other act is admissible.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Walden v. State · Hudson v. State““In all cases in which the death penalty has been imposed, the Court of Criminal Appeals shall notice any plain error or defect in the proceedings under review ... whenever such error has or probably has adversely affected the substantial right of the appellant.””
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.