Brown v. State

Isac Quincy BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Decided October 18, 2006.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2008

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-10-18

¶1Isac Quincy Brown, South Bay, pro se.

¶2No appearance required for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We affirm the denial of Brown's rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, wherein he seeks retroactive application of Blakely v. Washington,542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). As we did in Thomas v. State,914 So.2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), we certify conflict with Isaac v. State,911 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), to the extent that the court applied Blakely retroactively.

¶5GUNTHER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.