Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 941 F.2d 1428 - United States v. Four Parcels of Real Property in Greene & Tuscaloosa Counties

United States v. Four Parcels of Real Property in Greene & Tuscaloosa Counties’s Empirical Analysis

941 F.2d 1428 · 1991

Citation profile

628
cited by 628 later decisions
11
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

68 federal appellate · 18 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 628 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta (1993), Wilson v. B/E Aerospace, Inc. (2004)

68 federal appellate · 18 district · 13 state decisions — followed in 11 states

21401991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Tristani v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 628 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “affirmative evidence demonstrating that the nonmoving party will be unable to prove its case at trial.”
    68 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'go beyond the pleadings,' and by its own affidavits, or by 'depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file,' designate specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A factual dispute is genuine 'if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.'”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.