Tejada v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis
941 F.2d 1551 · 1991
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Chandler v. United States (2000), Lynn v. United States (2004)
30 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · Wainwright v. Sykes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'when his claims are merely "conclusory allegations unsupported by specifics”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a statement by a coconspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy” does not constitute hearsay). In Bourjaily, the Supreme Court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cargill v. Turpin“A state court is entitled to express its views on federal constitutional issues without waiving its procedural default rules.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Coulter v. Herring
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.