United States v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
941 F.2d 267 · 1991
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably United States v. Asibor (1997), United States v. Sanchez (1993)
33 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 46
Relies on Roviaro v. United States · United States v. Russell · Kuntz v. City of Dayton · Tiller v. NCNB Bank · Shibuya v. Voss
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“DEA agents approached him and offered to help him manufacture drugs, phoned him to pursue the arrangement, supplied the expertise, sold [him] the equipment, and supplied the laboratory site”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“review the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, making all reasonable inferences and credibility choices in favor of the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.