United States v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis
941 F.2d 811 · 1991
Citation profile
99 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 140 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably United States v. Khan (1993), United States v. Chaney (1992)
99 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343
Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · Marshall v. Lonberger · Lord Electric Co. v. United States · United States v. McConney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 140 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]ven when the offense of conviction involves a conspiracy or scheme, restitution must be limited to the loss attributable to the specific conduct underlying the conviction.”
22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To determine whether a plea agreement was breached, we first determine 'what the parties to this plea bargain reasonably understood to be the terms of the agreement.' What the parties agreed to is a question of fact determined by objective standards.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The appropriate remedy for a sentence imposed in excess of the sentencing court's authority is to vacate the entire sentence and remand for resentencing.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.