941 F. Supp. 2d 83 - King v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981A · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · Brown v. General Services Administration
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in Brown v. GSA precludes actions against federal officials for alleged constitutional violations as well as actions under other federal legislation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“both constitutional claims and common law tort claims arising out of the same conduct that forms the basis for a plaintiff's Title VII claim”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he Title VII remedy declared exclusive for federal employees”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.