Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 941 P2D 200 - Bachlet v. State

Bachlet v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)

Relies on Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Kolender v. Lawson · Perrin v. United States · Chapman v. United States · United States v. Dansker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nless otherwise defined, words will be interpreted as taking their ordinary, contemporary, common meaning.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Strane v. Municipality of Anchorage · State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles v. Niedermeyer
  2. “give adequate notice of the conduct that is prohibited”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles v. Niedermeyer

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.