¶1Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant’s filing a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion alleging, if he can, that he does not actually qualify for sentencing as a habitual felony offender or as a prison releasee reoffender. Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1251 n. 5 (Fla.2001); Adlington v. State, 840 So.2d 354 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 859 So.2d 513 (Fla.2003); Macaluso v. State, 912 So.2d 694, 695-96 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
941 So. 2d 1198
Hampton v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 8, 2006
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-11-08
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2017
5 state decisions
Relies on Bover v. State · 859 So. 2d 495 - Rivera v. State · Spears v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2006-11-08
View the full empirical analysis of this case →