McCall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 863 So. 2d 271 - Johnston v. State · 570 So. 2d 925 - Czubak v. State · 698 So. 2d 629 - Bozeman v. State · 785 So. 2d 1209 - LaMarca v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Here, the evidence that the car was stolen, or even missing, is not inextricably intertwined with the underlying crime. Absent this evidence, the state would not be unreasonably hampered in explaining how the charged crime came to light. All the jury needed to hear was that the vehicle in which McCall was found was not his, and that it belonged to Louis, who did not know McCall and did not own the jacket or the gun. Thus, it was not necessary or appropriate that the jury hear that the vehicle was missing or stolen from Louis, in order to explain how McCall ended up in the vehicle.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.