Merin Hunter Codman, Inc. v. WCC’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 932 F. Supp. 1420 - Barnes v. Burger King Corp. · 703 So. 2d 1049 - County of Brevard v. Miorelli Engineering · 785 So. 2d 1232 - Insurance Concepts and Design, Inc. v. Healthplan Services, Inc. · 765 So. 2d 737 - Abbott Labs., Inc. v. General Elec. Capital · Hunter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he interpretation of a contract is a question of law and an appellate court is not restricted in its review powers from reaching a construction contrary to that of the trial court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“elements of a breach of contract action are: (1) a valid contract; (2) a material breach; and (3) damages”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.