Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

941 So. 2d 421

Paulcin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 3, 2006

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-10-03

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2010

4 state decisions

Relies on Mingle v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-10-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Petitioner is the defendant in a criminal case pending in the circuit court and seeks review of certain interlocutory orders. These orders are reviewable on plenary appeal after imposition of judgment and sentence. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari and/or prohibition is denied. See Mingle v. State, 429 So.2d 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

¶2PETITION DENIED.

ERVIN and POLSTON, JJ., concur; HAWKES, J., concurs in result only.
/941/so2d/421 · .json · Public domain