Infantes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 471 So. 2d 32 - Tillman v. State · 699 So. 2d 1312 - Franqui v. State · 613 So. 2d 446 - Archer v. State · 610 So. 2d 1283 - Coleman v. State · Jackson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We find no abuse of discretion in the trial courts refusal to reread the first officers testimony and instructing the jury to rely on its collective memory.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hazuri v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.