L.T. v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on E.A.B. v. State · M.C. v. State · T.T. v. State · C.K. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The statute is designed to prohibit acts that are specifically and intentionally designed to stop or temporarily impede the progress of any normal school function or activity occurring on the school’s property. This is to ensure that the educational institutions and their administrators áre free to perform their lawful functions without undue or unwarranted interference or disruption from others. Its intended purpose is to prevent only that expression or conduct which materially disrupts or interferes with normal school functions or activities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.