Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

941 So. 2d 555

Docket No. 1D06-2780.

Small v. State

Ronald Davis SMALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 15, 2006.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-11-15

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2011

4 state decisions

Relies on Cabrera v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-11-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Ronald Davis Small, pro se, Appellant.

¶2Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Carolyn J. Mosley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Appellant challenges the trial court's summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the trial court improperly denied appellant's motion as untimely, we reverse.

¶5In 1976, appellant was sentenced to life in prison. He was later released on parole. In 2003, pursuant to a guilty plea, appellant was sentenced to 12 months in prison for grand theft. Appellant was later permitted to file a belated direct appeal of his 2003 conviction, which was voluntarily dismissed on March 16, 2006. On March 28, 2006, appellant filed a motion for postconviction relief in the 2003 case, and on April 27, 2006, the trial court denied appellant's motion as untimely.

¶6The trial court's denial of appellant's motion was improper. The two-year time limitation for filing motions for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 does not begin to run until an appellate court grants a petitioner's request for voluntary dismissal of a direct appeal. See Cabrera v. State, 721 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Accordingly, here the time limitation did not begin to run until appellant's belated direct appeal was voluntarily dismissed on March 16, 2006, and appellant's motion filed on March 28, 2006, was timely.

¶7We reverse the trial court's summary denial of appellant's motion for postconviction relief, and remand with directions that the trial court consider the motion on the merits.

¶8REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

¶9WEBSTER, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

/941/so2d/555 · .json · Public domain