941 So. 2d 950 - Nesbitt v. Frederick’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Foremost Ins. Co. v. Parham · Ray v. Montgomery · 565 So. 2d 212 - Sea Calm Shipping Co., S.A. v. Cooks · 792 So. 2d 369 - Nationwide Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. DPF ARCHITECTS · 483 So. 2d 392 - Fisher v. Space of Pensacola, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“` American Liberty Ins. Co. v. AmSouth Bank, 825 So.2d 786, 790 (Ala. 2002) (quoting Nationwide Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. DPF Architects, P.C., 792 So.2d 369, 372 (Ala.2000) (citations omitted))'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) a false representation (2) concerning a material fact (3) relied upon by the plaintiff (4) who was damaged as a proximate result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Fisher v. Comer Plantation, 772 So. 2d 455, 463 (Ala. 2000)(quoting Baker v. Bennett, 603 So. 2d 928, 935 (Ala. 1992)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.