Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 941 SW2D 322 - Monterrubio v. State

Monterrubio v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Mendenhall · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · City of El Centro v. United States · David W. McKay v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he trial court, who observes the demeanor and appearance of the witnesses, is in a better position to determine their credibility than the appellate court is by reading their testimony as it appears in the record. Therefore, an appellate court must view the record evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the trial court's ruling, and must sustain the trial court's ruling if it is reasonably supported by the record and is correct on any theory of law applicable to the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.